Mullá Husayn’s first stop: City of Isfáhán – Reaction from disciples of eminent mujtahid, Hájí Siyyid Muhammad-Báqir
circa 1935: madrisih of Ním-Ávard in Isfahan
With these noble words [The Báb’s reassuring words] ringing
in his ears, Mullá Husayn embarked upon his perilous enterprise. Wherever he
went, to whatever class of people he addressed himself, he delivered fearlessly
and without reserve the Message with which his beloved Master had entrusted
him. Arriving in Isfáhán, he established himself in the madrisih of Ním-Ávard.
Around him gathered those who on his previous visit to that city had known him
as the favoured messenger of Siyyid Kázim to the eminent mujtahid, Hájí Siyyid
Muhammad-Báqir.He, being now dead, had
been succeeded by his son, who had just returned from Najaf and was now
established upon the seat of his father. Hájí Muhammad-Ibráhím-i-Kalbásí had
also fallen seriously ill, and was on the verge of death. The disciples of the
late Hájí Siyyid Muhammad-Báqir, now freed from the restraining influence of
their departed teacher, and alarmed at the strange doctrines which Mullá Husayn
was propounding, vehemently denounced him to Hájí Siyyid Asadu’lláh, the son of
the late Hájí Siyyid Muhammad-Báqir. “Mullá Husayn,” they complained, “was
able, in the course of his last visit, to win the support of your illustrious
father to the cause of Shaykh Ahmad. No one among the Siyyid’s helpless
disciples dared to oppose him. He now comes as the upholder of a still more
formidable opponent and is pleading His Cause with still greater vehemence and
vigour. He is persistently claiming that He whose Cause he now champions is the
Revealer of a Book which is divinely inspired, and which bears a striking
resemblance to the tone and language of the Qur’án. In the face of the people
of this city, he has flung these challenging words: ‘Produce one like it, if
you are men of truth.’ The day is fast approaching when the whole of Isfáhán
will have embraced his Cause!” Hájí Siyyid Asadu’lláh returned evasive answers
to their complaints. “What am I to say?” he was at last forced to reply. Do you
not yourselves admit that Mullá Husayn has, by his eloquence and the cogency of
his argument, silenced a man no less great than my illustrious father? How can
I, then, who am so inferior to him in merit and knowledge, presume to challenge
what he has already approved? Let each man dispassionately examine these
claims. If he be satisfied, well and good; if not, let him observe silence, and
not incur the risk of discrediting the fair name of our Faith.” (Chapter 4,
‘The Dawn-Breakers’)