This state of tension continued until the time when a
certain Mullá ‘Abdu’lláh, a native of Shíráz and fervent admirer of both Shaykh
Ahmad and Siyyid Kázim, arrived in Qazvín at the beginning of the month of
Ramadán, in the year 1263 A.H. [August 13-September 12, 1847 A.D] Subsequently, in the course of his trial in Tihrán, in the presence of
the Sáhib-Diván, [Master of the Registers] this same Mullá ‘Abdu’lláh recounted
the following:
“I have never been a convinced Bábí. When I arrived at
Qazvín, I was on my way to Máh-Kú, intending to visit the Báb and investigate
the nature of His Cause. On the day of my arrival at Qazvín, I became aware
that the town was in a great state of turmoil. As I was passing through the
market-place, I saw a crowd of ruffians who had stripped a man of his
head-dress and shoes, had wound his turban around his neck, and by it were
dragging him through the streets. An angry multitude was tormenting him with
their threats, their blows and curses. ‘His unpardonable guilt,’ I was told in
answer to my enquiry, ‘is that he has dared to extol in public the virtues of
Shaykh Aḥmad and Siyyid
Kázim. Accordingly, Hájí Mullá Taqí, the Hujjatu’l-Islám, has pronounced him a
heretic and decreed his expulsion from the town.’”
I was amazed at the explanation given me. How could a
shaykhí, I thought to myself, be regarded as a heretic and be deemed worthy of
such cruel treatment? Desirous of ascertaining from Mullá Taqí himself the
truth of this report, I betook myself to his school and asked whether he had
actually pronounced such a condemnation against him. ‘Yes,’ he bluntly replied,
‘the god whom the late Shaykh Ahmad-i-Bahrayní worshipped is a god in whom I
can never believe. Him as well as his followers I regard as the very
embodiments of error.’ I was moved that very moment to smite his face in the
presence of his assembled disciples. I restrained myself, however, and vowed
that, God willing, I would pierce his lips with my spear so that he would never
be again able to utter such blasphemy.