“This city became the arena for passionate discussions which
profoundly troubled the general peace. The curious, the pilgrims, the
scandal-mongers met there commenting upon the news, approving or blaming,
exalting the young Siyyid, or, on the contrary, heaping upon him maledictions
and insults. Everyone was excited and enervated. The Mullás saw with bitter
anxiety the growing number of adherents to the new doctrine and their resources
diminished correspondingly. It became necessary to act, as prolonged tolerance
would empty the Mosques of their believers who were convinced that since Islám
did not defend itself, it acknowledged defeat. On the other hand, Husayn Khán,
governor of Shíráz, Nizámu’d-Dawlih, feared that, in letting things drift, the
scandal would become such that later it would be impossible to suppress it;
that would be to court disgrace. Besides, the Báb did not content himself with
preaching, he called to himself men of good-will. ‘He who knows the Word of God
and does not come to His assistance in the days of violence is exactly like
those who turned away from the testimony of his holiness Husayn, son of ‘Alí,
at Karbilá. Those are the impious ones!’ (Kitab-i-Baynu’l-Haramayn.) The civil
interests concurring with the interests of heaven, Nizámu’d-Dawlih and Shaykh
Abú-Turáb, the Imám-Jum’ih agreed that humiliation should be inflicted upon the
innovator such as would discredit him in the eyes of the populace; perhaps thus
they might succeed in quieting things.”
- A. L. M. Nicolas (“Siyyid ‘Alí-Muḥammad
dit le Báb,” pp. 229–230; Footnotes to chapter 8 provided by Shoghi Effendi)